Greeve St is a pick up zone in St Kilda and the site of the murder. |
Tracy Connelly is dead. She was murdered at her work place last week. Few are surprised for her work place is frightening and dangerous. No, Tracy did not fight in Afghanistan or walk a tight rope traversing the Grand Canyon. She was a street sex worker in St Kilda. And so another avoidable murder of a street sex worker occurred to apparent public indifference. Her relatives will mourn the bubbly character taken too soon. The rest of us, however, will shrug our collective shoulders, and many will think but not say out loud, “well what can one expect” and move on.
Ms Connelly
was murdered in a street across the road from mine. It is a street where violence is not unknown
and I am aware of several murders in the past decade. These were not the quick clinical killings by
bullet or lethal injection. These were
the slow, agonizing, awful murders by bashing or knife.
It is a
pick up zone for the street sex workers. Street sex work is illegal and this sets
up these often vulnerable women for violence and sexual assault. The police cannot easily protect a group in
an illegal vocation. I am sure that the
police will vigorously pursue this murder investigation but there are ways bloodshed
could be minimised.
In 2002, I
served on the Port Phillip Council and we finished a law reform process with
the State government via the Attorney Generals’ Street Prostitution Advisory
Group (AGSPAG) which included police, residents and one worker. That law reform process was motivated
ostensibly by activists in the community sick of the detritus of sex litter,
the constant leering of the men and the public sex. But there was another less publicised reason.
In 2000 there were a string of unspeakable assaults, rapes and the occasional
murder. The situation was out of control
and no council could abide such ferocity without trying to do something. Remember that street sex workers are really
vulnerable. Street sex workers
are often (but not always) drug dependent and that dependency is frequently
seeded by sexual assault as kids. So I sat on AGSPAG cognisant of both the concerns of the residents and
the terror of the women.
People
outside Melbourne might have heard of the rape and murder of Jill Meagher. That murder has now exposed what was
happening. Her murderer was the main
culprit. In 2002, Adrian Bayley was
prosecuted regarding 16 counts of rape committed between September 2000 and
March 2001. He pleaded guilty to the charges, all of which were committed
against prostitutes working in St Kilda.
Bayley had driven his victims to a lane behind a group of shops in
Elwood, before parking against a fence so they could not open the passenger
door. http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/bayleys-life-of-brutal-crime-20130611-2o1c1.html#ixzz2ZwpzTi3w
This information
closed the circle for me. It was a partial explanation why there was such
violence at the time of the AGSPAG process. Even though the Bayleys of the
world may come and go, there is still an endemic culture of violence that rules
street sex work. It needs to be addressed. And moreover, Bayley showed that
those who assault prostitutes easily alter their MO to visit violence upon the
wider community. Women at large are not
safe if they rely on the “Ripper Rationale” – murderers of sex workers are
gentle with and respectful of the rest of the gender.
The AGSPAG
group chose the concept of “tolerance zones”.
(Remember in NSW, street sex work is lawful as long as it is not
near or within view of a dwelling, school, church or hospital) Many other
reforms were implemented but AGSPAG is known for the one infamous idea that
failed to get up. The
rationale for these zones, places where street prostitution would be tolerated,
was to limit the areas of prostitution, increase the monitoring and safety of
the women and lessen the impact of the litter, public servicing and perceived
intimidation from pimps. There was a
sense of unanimity when AGSPAG reported. http://www.popcenter.org/problems/street_prostitution/PDFs/Victoria_prostitution_2002.pdf
This man has terrorised women in St Kilda and across Melbourne. |
That
unanimity dissolved in an instant when the community was consulted. We made errors in the process but it was
clearly controversial. If the bipartisan support at the State had stayed
intact, the proposal might have been modified to an acceptable extent. That did not occur. The Liberal Opposition went
opportunistically ballistic and the Labor Government went weak at the knees.
Moralistic hypocrisy prevailed and the flawed prohibition model is still with
us today with all of its cruelty and inefficacy. The one chance we had to have
a fundamental rethink of the safety both of the community and the sex workers
has probably been lost for decades. And
so more lives will be lost and many women will be bashed and/or raped because
sex workers apparently don’t matter.
It will not
surprise you, but I blame the Abrahamic religions of the Judaeo Christian
tradition. These are faiths which are
punitive. They set up moralistic schemes
where the evil are punished in some afterlife.
Sin is dealt with by prohibition not sophisticated harm minimisation
techniques needed in a modern time where the prohibition exacerbates harm. Drugs, prostitution and some socially
stigmatised practices like abortion have their harms increased by legal
prohibition. These are biblical in their
nature. They are wrong. I know that Mary Magdalene was perhaps a sex
worker and that in St Kilda, churches do wonderful things for street sex
workers. But the ideology of the creeds
still inform those who cannot cope with law reform.
The time
has come to revisit this issue. I know
that the world will not mourn Tracy Connelly like we mourned Jill Meagher but
they are both blameless women victims of appalling violence. The Jill Meagher case, though not
involving a sex worker, reminds us of the need to organise our community in
such a way as to make it safer for sex workers.
Bayley has shown, those who assault sex workers can cross over and
assault (and murder) the general public. Thus this is an issue for both a
vulnerable sub group and the whole female population.
Tolerance zones are probably
out of the question. At the last Council election, the notion of the zones was
used as means criticising candidates.
The incumbents at State and local levels will not go near the idea. A review is needed. The current prohibition
model fails our most vulnerable and indeed the female gender.