Here we go
again. Another atheist is bashing the
bejesus out of the saintly Mother Teresa.
Atheists
have made a habit of bashing Teresa. The late
Christopher Hitchins wrote a book objecting to her raising money without
scruples, consorting with dictators and spivs, providing appalling care in her
institutions and a lack of transparency in her accounts. Since that pioneering
work, there has been a conga line of atheists being mean to a woman who is a
Nobel Laureate and has been beatified (the third stage before sainthood). In her life
she was an apparent paragon of virtue who was to be sucked up to by any world
leader in search of a photo opportunity.
The beatified Nobel Laureate, Mother Teresa |
Atheists
take aim for she not only she is an archetype of the supposed uplifting
attributes of faith but is open to criticism as a self promoter rather than a
saint. The latest to deflate the
personality cult are a Canadian trio who repeat, extend and document the main Hitch
assertions.
So is it
fruitful grail for the knights of godlessness to quest for? Or is it a risk that we look churlish? Is the dead nun a legitimate target or should
she be left in peace to pick up post mortal rewards like sainthood and global
brand status?
I would
argue that now is the time, with some exception, to stop demonising the Catholic
equivalent of Bambi. I think it
sometimes demeans us. For all her
faults, she was utterly amazing. But
there are a couple of her beliefs that need to be mentioned and opposed. They are her views on poverty and suffering.
Suffering
and putting suffering into a context is a central theme of religious life. Suffering is perhaps best summarised in the crucifixion. The most central image of the Christian faith
is someone being tortured to death. Suffering
can be so central that some beliefs perversely glorify suffering and venerate
self harm. Where a faith links suffering to post mortal rewards, then happiness
can be linked to guilt and self deprivation is elevated to an art form. There are countless martyrs who have, under
the devotion to faith, embraced death, pain and starvation. These are deemed worthy of emulation. The Almost Saint Teresa had a view of
suffering that elevated it to a height of devotion which I think is very dangerous. Suffering is awful not noble. Suffering and poverty ought not to be endured
but avoided. Suffering as a precursor to
Paradise is a fine opiate but is not believable by most in the West. Linking suffering with guilt leads to an
ascetic life where sex, material comfort and absence of pain are somehow bad.
I can see
how the veneration of suffering gives comfort.
It demonstrates to those who are in anguish or agony that their faith
empathises. Their faith offers a post
mortal reward. Suffering is all
good. Torment is fine. Let us all join in an embrace torment and
fear fun. As an exemplar of the problems
with this ideology is the documented evidence that the life for patients in Teresa’s hospices, short as
it was, was pretty grim. Pain relief and medical resources were thin
on the ground, even during the good times, when Teresa was pulling in the big
bucks from donors.
Having said
all of this, it must be conceded the godless have NO consolation or comfort for
those who suffer distress. There is no
atheistic framework for understanding and dealing with misery and
distress. While we godless can criticise
the Christian approach, we must confess that we have nothing to contribute to
our unbelievers in pain.
My other gripe
is that Teresa's views blunt political and social action. India, at the time Almost Saint Teresa was there,
endured extreme poverty exacerbated by Soviet style central economic planning. The best thing for India was not her flawed
palliative care but political and economic reform. Almost Saint Teresa eschewed
such political action and in doing so contributed to the continuation of suffering. I’m not saying that she had a vested interest
in suffering (although she did). I’m saying that her focus on palliative care
and her views on the dignity of poverty got in the way of reform and the
alleviation of the said poverty.
In our code
of footy there is the phrase, “Going the man not the ball” which is generalised
to indicate personal, ad hominem attacks are to be deplored. So it is with Almost Saint Teresa. Let us praise the little Albanian for the
amazing person that she was. Let us be inspired by her global brand and her
devotion to duty. Her achievements were
legion. But let not that veneration
blind us the stupidity of her views on suffering and poverty.
What is
your view?
Do you
agree that it is time to move on from just knocking the woman?
What do you
think of her views on suffering and poverty?
How should
the godless comfort those who suffer? Whilst Christians are wrong, we godless
are a vacuum on the question of assisting our flock deal with their
torment. What should we do about this?
Over to you
guys...